10,000 border guards for Frontex: Why the EU risks conflated expectations
Sep 21, 2018
SEE MORE
The European Commission’s recent proposal for 10,000 new border guards for Frontex has sparked intense discussions about what kind of border management the EU and its member states want. As the debate continues, a few practical and political considerations should be taken into account:
Read the full paper here
- From a governance perspective, the Commission’s approach seeks to strike a delicate balance between a functional need for a more centralised EU border control regime and national prerogatives for sovereignty. The proposal may, however, tilt the scale in favour of the Commission, whose proposal limits the extent to which member states could refuse Frontex to get engaged in an emergency situation.
- In terms of accountability, Frontex already operates in a field with high stakes concerning human rights and civil liberties. Any additional transfer of powers to this EU agency could raise concerns about potential breaches of human rights. Accountability would become even more important if Frontex were granted a greater role in the creation and management of the ‘disembarkation centres' in third countries.
- On the political front, calls for more stringent border controls are often a way of expressing a preference for fewer migrant arrivals in the EU, notably from asylum seekers. However, a more powerful Frontex agency will not be the catch-all solution to reduce migratory pressures. Nor will it be the end of the polarisation of the migration debate in Europe.
Read the full paper here
