As the number of climate initiatives – as well as climate events - grows, the call for action is becoming increasingly urgent. Garnering support from a range of groups with diverging views is challenging, however. Some initiatives meet with resistance or simply add fuel to an already heated debate. While it is important to provide scientifically accurate information, it is equally important to take account of values and identities and the role of the state.
This on-line Policy Dialogue - organized in cooperation with King Baudouin Foundation - looked at climate change as a national security issue and assessed the potential role of nationalism in mobilising public support for radical action, including possible tools, methods and practices for strengthening climate initiatives in order drew on Anatol Lieven’s recent book Climate Change and the Nation State.
“The task must be to convince elites and people that climate change really is a threat and that protecting people in their countries also means helping countries elsewhere to mitigate and adapt or fear the consequences of inaction. Threat perception is a prime mover of human effort,” said Anatol Lieven. “I agree solidarity, but I fear that without using the language of sacrifice we will play into the hands of the opposing camp who will exaggerate the cost and use it as an argument against radical action,” he concluded.
This idea was challenged during the dialogue by Heather Grabbe, Director of the Open Society European Policy Institute, “What is needed, is not the language of sacrifice, but a vision of a future better life in a carbon neutral or climate neutral economy and society.” However, it takes more than nation states to make this happen. Many changes are driven by communities, businesses, cities, despite national governments. According to Annika Hedberg, Head of the EPC Sustainable Prosperity for Europe Programme, “The EU can provide guidance, coordination, when nation states are slow to act. EU targets and policy framework provide incentives for action,”